TEAM F: Parking Meters at Carnegie Mellon University Kaylee Makel, Nancy Geronian, Victor Wilczynski, Jeff Lee, Jung Moon Jang GENERAL COMMENTS: * looks like things are going reasonably well for your project * We talked about how to figure out how many times you would need to do the census but that did not make it into the slides. In the paper, please show the calculation for this, and then discuss how you decided how many times you could actually do the census, even if it was less times that the calculation suggests. * Nice set of variables to collect, nice codebook for makes of cars. * Many "glitches/errors" (slides 11-12) are interesting in their own right, and it may be useful to tabulate them and talk/write about them separately I'm not marking individual categories below, since I'm giving you all 100's on the presentations. GRADING SCHEME FOR PRESENTATIONS Introduction: /10 What’s it about? Research Question & Motivation Questionnaire, or at least a couple sample questions from it Body: /50 Describe the work you have done so far How sample was selected... Any advice for future 303 students? How survey was set up and respondents contacted Glitches? How did you fix ‘em? What is the nonresponse or refusal rate so far? How will you decrease it? What are the distinguishing features of nonresponders/refusers? Successes? Tell us. Conclusion: /10 Future work – what’s left to do? When will you / did you cut off data collection? What post-processing and/or analyses will you perform? (nonresponse, poststratification, answering your research questions, etc.) Anything else? Individuals: /30 Know what you're talking about. Sound practiced, not rushed. At least 2 real slides per person Each person will get a score which is the sum of the above (so, 70 pts from group preparation of slides, 30 pts for individual presentation), except that un-excused no-shows will get 0. Kaylee Makel, Nancy Geronian, Victor Wilczynski, Jeff Lee, Jung Moon Jang