Section 1: Introduction                             20/20

The introduction does a good job of introducing the question and
motivation.  Good summary of the literature you referenced.


Section 2: Methods                                  17/20

This section contains the appropriate content, and it is clear you
thought about your survey methods.  How did the calculations you did
in section 2.2 of MOE and strata size impact your decisions when
choosing how many people to contact initially?  Some of the reporting
of the number of people contacted, follow-up procedure and response
rate is sloppy.  Numbers don’t match up between section 2.3 and 2.5,
and it’s unclear why you only sent follow-up emails to a subset of
people who hadn’t responded.  There were 986 people who hadn’t
responded, but you only sent 864 reminders?


Section 3: Results                                  15/20

It is clear that you were thorough in analyzing your data.  I think
you identified some interesting subtleties, despite having a smaller
sample size than you would have liked and a fair bit (I think?) of
incomplete data.

However, the questions you are trying to answer and the interesting
results get swamped by the large number of exploratory plots and
cut-and-paste regression/anova/etc output.  These plots often do not
have descriptive axis labels (the reader doesn’t know what a “3” in
“IdealRate” means, for instance) making them hard to interpret.
Section 3.5 (the output from your Tukey HSD) belongs in an appendix
rather than the main text.  The same is probably true for the R
regression output.


Section 4: Discussion                               19/20

This is a good discussion of some of the strengths and potential
weaknesses of your survey.  There are a couple blanks that you
neglected to fill in with the proper information.


List of References                                  8/10

One reference left as “reference needed” (section 1.1) and one
footnote retained (section 1.2)


Appendices                                          10/10


TOTAL                                               89/100