Feedback - Team A

The draft of the project report is very strong and generally adheres
to the guidelines laid out for the report. Some comments:

- There isn't much [anything?] in the introduction about existing
  work/literature on this topic. It looks like you're going to
  incorporate some information from the Harvard IOP survey in the
  Results for the sake of comparison sake; it might be a good idea to
  at least mention in the introduction that that survey is out there.

- As you've noted, post-stratification will be necessary. I think I'm
  echoing some of Prof. Junker's earlier comments in saying that it
  may have been preferable to pre-stratify, but that post-stratifying
  should be acceptable.

- Hopefully there are enough responses after the recontacting process!
  I don't really think there's anything you can do about this now...

- It's good that you mentioned that this study emphasizes breadth over
  depth of one issue; I agree that that's the case, and I don't
  necessarily think that's a bad thing.

MV


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BY BJ:

* Mike's comments above are great and I hope that you pay close
  attention to them as you finish the project and write your final
  report.

* Please convert the list of references at the end to APA format (as
  discussed in class) and include a discussion of the references
  (citing each one) in the introduction to the paper.

* It looks like you dealt with confidentiality in a good way.