Group E - Student perceptions of components of innovative thinking Introduction: 10/10 What’s it about? Research Question & Motivation Questionnaire, or at least a couple sample questions from it * Good intro, overview of survey instrument Body: 50/50 Describe the work you have done so far How sample was selected... Any advice for future 303 students? How survey was set up and respondents contacted Glitches? How did you fix ‘em? What is the nonresponse or refusal rate so far? How will you decrease it? What are the distinguishing features of nonresponders/refusers? Successes? Tell us. * Good description of process * Note that the number you contacted, 320, is not the same as the number of respondents, which seems to be 77 as of the time of this presentation. * Results were interesting but very hard to hear Chia Shen. Conclusion: 10/10 Future work – what’s left to do? When will you / did you cut off data collection? What post-processing and/or analyses will you perform? (nonresponse, poststratification, answering your research questions, etc.) Anything else? * great to hear about data cleaning, imputation, post stratification, etc. * seems clear some post stratification will be necessary Individuals: /30 Know what you're talking about. Sound practiced, not rushed. At least 2 real slides Jose Alfredo Galvan jagalvan@andrew.cmu.edu 30/30 100 Nektarios Leontiadis leontiadis@cmu.edu 30/30 100 Mohammad Baradaran Shoraka mbaradar@andrew.cmu.edu 30/30 100 Chia-Hsuan Yang chiahsuy@andrew.cmu.edu 25/30 95 [hard to hear you!] Each person will get a score which is the sum of the above (so, 70 pts from group preparation of slides, 30 pts for individual presentation), except that no-shows will get 0.