Group A - Academic integrity and course archives Introduction: 8/10 What’s it about? Research Question & Motivation Questionnaire, or at least a couple sample questions from it * Nice clear introduction * Would have liked to see a bit more about the specific questions asked on the questionnaire, otherwise great * This seems to be a topic that would be of interest to the Tartan Body: /50 Describe the work you have done so far How sample was selected... Any advice for future 303 students? How survey was set up and respondents contacted Glitches? How did you fix ‘em? What is the nonresponse or refusal rate so far? How will you decrease it? What are the distinguishing features of nonresponders/refusers? Successes? Tell us. * Sampling design slide (sl 4) was a little confusing. * Overall, sounds like pretty successful implementation * fascinating about sensitivity of respondents about q's Conclusion: /10 Future work – what’s left to do? When will you / did you cut off data collection? What post-processing and/or analyses will you perform? (nonresponse, poststratification, answering your research questions, etc.) Anything else? * Looks worthwhile to post-strat on gender, class; less clear you need to do anything about greek status... Individuals: /30 Know what you're talking about. Sound practiced, not rushed. At least 2 real slides Bin Yang biny@andrew.cmu.edu 30/30 98 William Ouyang wouyang@andrew.cmu.edu 30/30 98 Victoria Docherty vdochert@andrew.cmu.edu 30/30 98 P. Daphne Tsatsoulis ptsatsous@andrew.cmu.edu 30/30 98 Each person will get a score which is the sum of the above (so, 70 pts from group preparation of slides, 30 pts for individual presentation), except that no-shows will get 0.