Subject:
two questions are broken
From:
Dave Eckhardt <de0u@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date:
Fri, 01 Apr 2011 03:35:29 -0400
To:
groupg.303@gmail.com
CC:
Dave Eckhardt <de0u@andrew.cmu.edu>, Dong Seob Kim <dongseok@andrew.cmu.edu>, Hye Jung Cho <hyejungc@andrew.cmu.edu>, Erica Choi <ejchoi@andrew.cmu.edu>, Aiena Garg <aiena@cmu.edu>, John Shoup <johnshou@andrew.cmu.edu>, Brian Junker <brian@stat.cmu.edu>

**********************************************************************
19. Do you think ± grading will increase or decrease students'
average GPA?

Yes
No
Don't know

20. Do you think ± grading will increase or decrease students' chances
of getting a job?

Yes
No
Don't know
**********************************************************************

Meanwhile, I am kind of curious as to what level of actual anonymity
exists in the face of this pair of questions:

  1. What is your Job title (assistant professor, head of department,
  teaching professor, professor, etc)?

  2. Department you are associated with? (Statistics, English, Chemistry,
  etc)

Was the sample drawn so that {Associate Teaching Professor, Computer
Science} appears multiple times?  Is that still anonymous after the
"number of years at CMU" variable is considered?

Dave Eckhardt